http://decaflon.com/notes/ Decaflon Thread: The PHP Benchmark en Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:51:48 +0000 http://decaflon.com/programming/notes/14777/p/1/#response-117171 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:01:57 Scrivs 117171 <p>Ah yup:</p> <blockquote><p>Given that the previous version of the tests have been very controvercial and incorrect, I must appologise for forgetting to implement the reset() function to allow the while() loops to start from the beginning instead of the end. Thanks to Anthony Bush for spotting this out.</p></blockquote> http://decaflon.com/programming/notes/14777/p/1/#response-117170 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 04:01:22 Scrivs 117170 <p>Whoa, what the hell? Yesterday he had the while loop as much, much faster. Someone must've found an error in his testing code. </p> http://decaflon.com/programming/notes/14777/p/1/#response-117169 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:52:28 Ozone42 117169 <p>Looking at that chart, foreach is the fastest. The lower the time it takes the better, no?</p> <p>My main improvements are reducing/optimizing database calls. </p> http://decaflon.com/programming/notes/14777/p/1/#response-117165 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:10:56 Scrivs 117165 <p>This was a great article and I didn't even realize that such a subtle change in code would have such adverse effects to the speed of it. Especially crazy because the majority of our code runs off of foreach loops so over time I will be going back and recycling through them to change them to while loops.</p> <p>Has anyone else seen speed improvements with changes in their PHP code? </p>